-
Pages
-
Categories
-
Archives
- September 2025
- March 2022
- January 2020
- December 2019
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- November 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- July 2011
- May 2011
Blogroll
-
RSS Feeds
-
Meta
Thursday of the Second Week of Lent – Gospel
Harvard debate stresses meaning, purpose of marriage
At the heart of the national debate on same-sex unions is a fundamental disagreement on the nature of marriage, said a participant in a recent discussion at Harvard Law School.
Arguments in favor of redefining marriage are simply “wrong about what marriage is,” explained debater Sherif Girgis.
He added that enshrining same-sex “marriage” in law “would be harmful for the common good, and in particular for the common goods that get government involved in marriage in the first place.”
Girgis is a law student at Yale Law School as well as a PhD. candidate at Princeton University. He recently co-authored the book “What is Marriage” alongside Professor Robert George of Princeton University and Ryan Anderson of the Heritage Foundation.
Challenging him in the debate was Professor Andrew Koppelman, who teaches law and politics at Northwestern University.
The discussion, sponsored by the Harvard Federalist Society, was held at Harvard Law School on Jan. 31 and aired on C-SPAN on Feb. 19.
Koppelman presented arguments in favor same-sex “marriage” and criticized Girgis’ book for being “so novel and esoteric,” joking that the audience of Harvard Law students was “still trying to get it.”
He added that “marriage is not essentially anything,” saying that social norms by nature “evolve,” and that marriage is no different.
Girgis, however, observed that nearly every government and society throughout history have been involved in regulating marriage.
Governments typically do not regulate intimate relationships such as friendships, he noted. Marriage is an exception, he said, because it is an institution that offers key services to society, namely the provision, care and education of a new generation of citizens.
It is because of “the social need to promote those stabilizing norms” that governments oversee marriage, he explained.
Girgis also warned of the social harm that would follow a redefinition of marriage, saying that in debates on this topic, people should be aware of the “implications for the future, and for future marriages in particular.”
While no-fault divorce was hailed as an acceptable and harmless way of ending high-conflict marriages, the author said, “it changed people’s understanding of what they were getting into” and resulted in an end to many medium-conflict unions.
The causalities of this arrangement were children who experience split homes or were raised with an absent parent, he said.
The normalization of same-sex unions “teaches that mothers and fathers are replaceable in terms of parenting” and will likely lead to an increase in children who do not know at least one of their biological parents, he observed.
Girgis critiqued “the main vision of marriage” espoused within society that defines marriage as primarily an emotional union.
He explained that while it is consistent for that view to accept same-sex partnerships as marriage, that view is unable to explain “less controversial features that we all agree set marriage from other bonds,” such as monogamy and exclusivity.
Furthermore, he said, in making emotion the determining characteristic of marriage, there is no reason for it to require a “pledge of permanence,” and there is no logical reason to prevent marriage from being extended to multiple partners or non-sexual partners who share an emotional bond.
Instead, Girgis suggested a definition of marriage based upon “complementarity,” or the ability of spouses to bear and raise children, saying that this definition of marriage with the family at its core explains other attributes associated with the institution, such as permanence, monogamy and the sexual relationship of the spouses.
He said that the common contemporary understanding of marriage “suggests that the norm of sexual complementarity is arbitrary,” but if one accepts that a man and woman’s ability to bear children is unnecessary for the institution, “then so is permanence, so is monogamy.”
In addition, Girgis commented on the appeal of redefining marriage as a way to combat anti-gay bias and unjust discrimination against those who have same-sex attractions.
While he agreed that injustice must be countered, he warned against using marriage to do so, cautioning that such a move would have devastating harmful consequences.
Rather than changing the definition of a timeless and foundational social institution, he said, “I think the answer to bullying is to fight bullying, the answer to prejudice is to affirm the equal dignity of every human being.”
Read more: http://www.ewtnnews.com/catholic-news/US.php?id=7119#ixzz2M6zFUuyr
From EWTN News
Pope Benedict XVI’s final General Audience
Wednesday of the Second Week of Lent – Gospel
Gospel Mt 20:17-28
Then the mother of the sons of Zebedee approached Jesus with her sons and did him homage, wishing to ask him for something. He said to her, “What do you wish?” She answered him, “Command that these two sons of mine sit, one at your right and the other at your left, in your kingdom.” Jesus said in reply, “You do not know what you are asking. Can you drink the chalice that I am going to drink?” They said to him, “We can.” He replied, “My chalice you will indeed drink, but to sit at my right and at my left, this is not mine to give but is for those for whom it has been prepared by my Father.” When the ten heard this, they became indignant at the two brothers. But Jesus summoned them and said, “You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and the great ones make their authority over them felt. But it shall not be so among you. Rather, whoever wishes to be great among you shall be your servant; whoever wishes to be first among you shall be your slave. Just so, the Son of Man did not come to be served but to serve and to give his life as a ransom for many.”
Wednesday of the Second Week of Lent
Keep your family, O Lord,
schooled always in good works,
and so comfort them with your protection here
as to lead them graciously to gifts on high.
Through our Lord Jesus Christ, your Son,
who lives and reigns with you in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, for ever and ever.
– Amen.
The Roman Missal
The latest about after the Pope’s resignation
The Vatican has released some more details about what happens after Pope Benedict XVI’s resignation is effective at 8:00 p.m. on Thursday evening Rome Time.
His title will be “Pontiff Emeritus” and he will be addressed as “His Holiness, Benedict XVI.”
He will wear a white cassock without mozetta (the arm length white cape), and will no longer wear the red papal shoes.
His “fisherman’s ring” and the lead seal of his papacy will be destroyed.
When the hour arrives for the “Sede Vacante” to begin, the Pope will be at Castel Gandolfo. At that time, the Swiss Guard will take their leave and return to the Vatican, since they are charged to protect only the Roman Pontiff. The Vatican Gendarmes will from that moment on be responsible for the safety and security of the Pontiff Emeritus.
The last public appearance as Pope Benedict will take place on Wednesday morning for a General Audience in St. Peter’s Square. Huge crowds are expected, and more than 50,000 tickets have already been issued. At the conclusion of the audience the Holy Father will circle around the crowd in the Popemobile in order to greet them more closely.
Thursday, the last day of his pontificate, he will meet with the Cardinals who are present in Rome, in order to greet each one personally. There will be no speeches at this event. He is scheduled to travel by helicopter to the Papal Residence at Castel Gandolfo at 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, arriving at approximately 5:15 pm. He will greet the civil dignitaries upon his arrival, and then will bless the people of Castel Gandolfo from the balcony of the Apostolic Palace there.
On Friday, March 1, the Dean of the College of Cardinals, Angelo Sodano, will send a letter to all Cardinals summoning them to Rome. Since most will already be in Rome, it is possible that the first of the General Congregations of Cardinals may happen on Monday, March 4, but almost certainly sometime next week. At one of those meetings, the date for the Conclave will be set. Also, at one of those meetings, the Cardinals will receive their room assignments in Casa Santa Marta (St. Martha’s House), which will be drawn by lot.
Stayed tuned. There’s probably more coming!
The Concho Padre
Cathedral Lenten Mission continues
SECOND DAY OF THE CATHEDRAL LENTEN PARISH MISSION TONIGHT AT 7:00 P.M. BE THERE AND BRING A FRIEND IF AT ALL POSSIBLE!
Tuesday of the Second Week of Lent
Guard your Church,
we pray, O Lord,
in your unceasing mercy, and,
since without you mortal humanity is sure to fall,
may we be kept by your constant helps
from all harm and directed to all that brings salvation.
Through our Lord Jesus Christ, your Son,
who lives and reigns with you in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, for ever and ever.
– Amen.
Tuesday of the Second Week of Lent
Gospel
MT 23:1-12
Jesus spoke to the crowds and to his disciples, saying,
“The scribes and the Pharisees
have taken their seat on the chair of Moses.
Therefore, do and observe all things whatsoever they tell you,
but do not follow their example.
For they preach but they do not practice.
They tie up heavy burdens hard to carry
and lay them on people’s shoulders,
but they will not lift a finger to move them.
All their works are performed to be seen.
They widen their phylacteries and lengthen their tassels.
They love places of honor at banquets, seats of honor in synagogues,
greetings in marketplaces, and the salutation ‘Rabbi.’
As for you, do not be called ‘Rabbi.’
You have but one teacher, and you are all brothers.
Call no one on earth your father;
you have but one Father in heaven.
Do not be called ‘Master’;
you have but one master, the Christ.
The greatest among you must be your servant.
Whoever exalts himself will be humbled;
but whoever humbles himself will be exalted.”
Our Parish Lenten Mission has begun!
Great first night for our Parish Mission. If you missed it there is still time. Come out tomorrow night at 7 for Day 2. Bring a friend with you!
The Concho Padre